Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Award of grants in the field of defence - EDF - Funding of research actions - Call for proposals EDF‑2021-MCBRN-R - Rejection of the applicant’s proposal on account of non-compliance with the admissibility conditions and criteria - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Error of assessment )
Institut Jožef Stefan, established in Ljubljana (Slovenia), represented by A. Bochon, lawyer,
European Commission, represented by R. Tricot, E. Stamate and T. Isacu de Groot, acting as Agents,
composed of P. Škvařilová-Pelzl, acting as President, G. Steinfatt (Rapporteur) and D. Kukovec, Judges,
By its action brought pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Institut Jožef Stefan, coordinator of the PANDORA consortium, seeks annulment of the Decision of the European Commission of 3 January 2023 rejecting the project proposal with reference 101075036-PANDORA (‘the project proposal’), submitted in response to European Defence Fund (EDF) call for proposals EDF‑2021-MCBRN-R (‘the contested decision’).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.