Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 1 P1 • Peaceful enjoyment of possessions • Applicant association's loss of opportunity for a significant period of time to use rented building for the opening of the school • Domestic authorities' failure to take swift measures to stop the school blockage and to connect the building to the local municipality's sewage system
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Georges Ravarani , President , Lado Chanturia, Carlo Ranzoni, María Elósegui, Mattias Guyomar, Kateřina Šimáčková, Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 24225/19 ) against Georgia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by Georgian Muslim Relations, a legal entity, and seven Georgian nationals ("the applicants") listed in the appendix, on 25 April 2019;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.