Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark doyum - Earlier national word mark Doyum - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the goods - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Yadex International GmbH, established in Frankfurt am Main (Germany), represented by P. Kohl, lawyer,
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent,
composed of M.J. Costeira, President, U. Öberg (Rapporteur) and E. Tichy‑Fisslberger, Judges,
having regard to the fact that no request for a hearing was submitted by the parties within three weeks after service of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure, and having decided to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure, pursuant to Article 106(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.