Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
����������� ����������������������������������������������������� �����������������������������CASE NO: OX18C00117
Ms Wilkins, Counsel, for the Fourth and Fifth Respondents, acting through their Children�s Guardian
In May 2017, F2 made an application for a Child Arrangements Order to enable B to spend time with him.� Within his application he alleged that M was aggressive, exposed B to inappropriate sexual and violent media and that during a handover on 23 rd April M was aggressive during a contact handover and exposed her bottom in front of the children (PL3).
In October 2017, M alleged that B was being made to perform oral sex on A. When this allegation was investigated by both police and social services, both children denied the allegation and no corroborating evidence could be found to substantiate the allegation. This allegation is part of a series of allegations M has since been making about the children having sexual intercourse with each other. The children have consistently denied this when spoken to by professionals.
Matters came to a head on the 16 th of September 2018 when A presented herself at a police station alleging that she had been physically assaulted by her mother. A stated that her mother had threatened her with a knife and had pinned her to the floor and kicked and grabbed her genitals. B was at home during this assault. The police attended the home, arrested M and placed A and B under police protection.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.