Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Josep Casadevall, President, ��������� Luis L�pez Guerra, ��������� J�n �ikuta, ��������� Dragoljub Popović, ��������� Kristina Pardalos, ��������� Johannes Silvis, ��������� Valeriu Griţco, judges, and Stephen Phillips Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 15911/08 ) against the Kingdom of the Netherlands lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Netherlands national, Mr Richard Geisterfer (�the applicant�), on 26 March 2008.
The applicant was represented initially by Ms T. Spronken, at that time a lawyer practising in Amsterdam, and subsequently by Mr T. Dieben and Ms G.A. Jansen, also lawyers practising in Amsterdam. The Netherlands Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent, Mr R.A.A. B�cker, and their Deputy Agent, Ms L. Egmond, both of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.