Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Appeal - Common policy on asylum and immigration - Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 - European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union - European Border and Coast Guard - European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) - Frontex's obligations to protect fundamental rights - Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex - Frontex's non-contractual liability - Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered )
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 14 November 2023,
represented by L.-M. Komp, A.M. van Eik, advocaten, and E. Sharpston, Barrister-at-Law,
European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), represented initially by H. Caniard, R.-A. Popa and C. Rueger, acting as Agents, and subsequently by H. Caniard, C. Carroll and R.-A. Popa, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, avocat,
composed of K. Lenaerts, President, T. von Danwitz, Vice-President, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe, M.L. Arastey Sahún, I. Ziemele, J. Passer, O. Spineanu-Matei (Rapporteur), Presidents of Chambers, S. Rodin, D. Gratsias, M. Gavalec, Z. Csehi and B. Smulders, Judges,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.