Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             The first appellant is the mother of the second and third appellants. She appealed the respondent's decision dated 26 October 2021 to refuse entry clearance on human rights grounds as the dependent adult child of a former Gurkha. Her parents and her adult brother are settled in the UK.
             First-tier Tribunal Judge C.A.S. O'Garro ('the judge') dismissed the appeal in a decision sent on 14 November 2022. It is not necessary to set out the judge's findings in detail because they are known to the parties and there is a level of agreement as to the outcome of the appeal before the Upper Tribunal.
             The appellant applied for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on the following grounds:
(i)              The judge failed to give adequate consideration to relevant matters, including evidence relating to compassionate circumstances surrounding the appellant's history of domestic abuse before leaving her husband and becoming dependent on her family members once again.
(ii)            The judge erred in the assessment of the threshold required to show family life for the purpose of Article 8(1) of the European Convention.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.