Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
            The appellants' appeals were dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Taylor ("Judge Taylor") for reasons set out in a decision promulgated on 24 April 2023.
            At the conclusion of the hearing before me I informed the parties that I allow the first appellant's appeal against the decision of Judge Taylor, but dismiss the second appellant's appeal. I informed the parties that I will set out my reasons for that decision in writing and this I now do.
            The appellants claim the judge erred in law by failing to consider 'in depth' the best interests of the appellants' children who are living in the UK. They claim the judge failed to have any proper regard to the evidence that was before the FtT that comprises of money transfers and receipts that demonstrate the appellants are dependent on their sponsor. They were members of the sponsor's 'household' previously and they continue to be dependent on her.
            Permission to appeal was granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Singer on 5 June 2023. Judge Singer said:
"2. The decision is arguably very brief and it is arguable that, in respect of the first Appellant, that brevity was such that the Judge did not have adequate regard to relevant evidence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.