Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
   This is an application by solicitors acting on behalf of Zahid (the Applicant) for Reconsideration of a decision dated 24 of August 2021 which followed an oral hearing on 13 August 2021. The outcome of the decision was not to direct release.
   Rule 28 (1) of the Parole Board Rules provides that applications for Reconsideration may be made in eligible cases either on the basis of (a) that the decision is irrational and/or (B) that it is procedurally unfair.
   I have considered the application on the papers. These are the dossier consisting of 622 pages, the application for Reconsideration and the decision letter.
   The Applicant is serving an indeterminate sentence for public protection which was imposed on 5 November 2009. His tariff expired on 13 August 2012.
   The offences were four robberies. The robberies were committed against individuals at knifepoint and were pre-planned.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.