Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
These appeals arise from an application brought by Permanent TSB Group Holdings plc (“ the Company ”) for an order pursuant to Section 85 of the Companies Act 2014 (“ the 2014 Act ”) confirming a resolution passed by its shareholders providing for a reduction in its company capital by way of the cancellation of 3,562,883,512 deferred shares (“ the Confirmation Application ”).
It will be necessary to say something more about the Confirmation Application below and to explain the nature and origin of these deferred shares .
By way of two notices of appeal, the Appellant, Piotr Skoczylas, appeals against the following orders of the High Court (Haughton J):
An order of 4 April 2018 refusing an application made by Mr Skoczylas that the Judge recuse himself from dealing with the Confirmation Application (“ the Recusal Order ”) 1
The Judge’s ex tempore Ruling on the recusal application is at page 95 and following of the transcript of the hearing on 4 April 2018 (which I shall refer to as “ Day 1 ”).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.