Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
                  For the reasons explained in this judgment the court is satisfied that the applicant is entitled to an order quashing the Decision of the Tribunal on one of the four main grounds that were advanced on her behalf, which relates to the treatment of the COI by the Tribunal and the resulting finding that there was effective state protection available to the applicant if she was returned to Georgia.
                  The applicant arrived in Ireland in March 2022 and sought international protection. She underwent the regular process of filling a questionnaire, and, on the 25 July 2023, she attended for an interview with the IPO, with the assistance of an interpreter.
              In response to the request from the Tribunal, the applicant made further submissions and appended further materials.
              The Tribunal decision ( the Decision ) was dated the 7 August 2024 and was sent to the applicant on the 8 August 2024. The Tribunal had decided that the appeal could be dealt with on a " papers only " basis. It was of the view that credibility issues could be resolved without an oral hearing and that it had raised matters in correspondence that would have been raised if there was an oral hearing.
              The Tribunal provided a summary of the core facts, and in a passage that was the subject of submissions at the hearing, noted:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.