Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
���� VICTOR OGUNBUSOLA (instructed by Gracelands Solicitors) for the First Respondent
����� ���LYNNE NAYLOR (Cameron Jones Hussell and Howe) for the Second Respondent
     ����������These proceedings pursuant to Part IV of the Children Act 1989 ("CA89") concern one child, namely [X], who was born [in 2024] ("X") . It follows that X is rapidly approaching his first birthday.
     ����������The relevant local authority is [a local authority in Wales] ("LA"). The LA has been represented by Mr Jones, solicitor, at this hearing.
     ���������I note at this point that the identity of X's father has not been confirmed during the preparation for this hearing. I will return in more detail in relation to the circumstances surrounding the court's attempt to secure confirmation of paternity of X later in the judgment.� It follows that there is no other parent with Parental Responsibility ("PR").
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.