Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
      The Appellants appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Chana (hereafter "the Judge") promulgated on 12 April 2023 which dismissed the Appellants' appeal against the Respondent's refusal of the applications for entry clearance dated 29 April 2022.
      Permission to appeal was initially refused by Judge Parkes on 23 May 2023, but was later granted on renewal of the application directly to the Upper Tribunal by Upper Tribunal Judge Kamara on 4 July 2023.
      The Appellants applied for entry clearance on 8 December 2021 and 9 December 2021 on the basis of their position as adult dependent sons of a widow of an ex-Gurkha soldier.
      The Appellants' late father served in the British Army for 16 years before his discharge on 25 November 1975. Unfortunately, the Appellants' father passed away on 13 September 2010 and it was not until 5 October 2018 that the Appellants' mother (their Sponsor) was granted Indefinite Leave to Enter the UK on the basis of her deceased husband's Gurkha status.
      In the Judge's decision, she concluded that the Appellants had failed to establish that they enjoy an Article 8(1) ECHR family life with their Sponsor.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.