Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an application by Zafar (the Applicant) for reconsideration of a decision of an oral hearing dated the 6 September 2020 not to direct release.
Rule 28(1) of the Parole Board Rules 2019 provides that applications for reconsideration may be made in eligible cases either on the basis (a) that the decision is irrational and/or (b) that it is procedurally unfair.
� The Dossier (now containing 339 numbered pages), that is, the same dossier as the Oral Hearing Panel (OHP) had with the addition of the Decision Letter;
� The Applicant�s Response to my Request for Further and Better Particulars of the Request for Reconsideration.
The Applicant was released on licence in October 2017. Whilst on licence he committed an offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm on his partner. He had not told his supervising officer of the relationship. He was returned to custody in April 2018. For that offence the Applicant received an 8-month sentence in September 2018. This was his first conviction for intimate partner violence.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.