UI2024002040 & UI2024002042

                  Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant has been granted anonymity, and is to be referred to in these proceedings by the initials KYE and KAE respectively. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant.

              The grounds of onward appeal came before the First-tier Tribunal when permission to appeal was granted in part. Grounds 1 and 2 were found to be arguable given the judge's finding that it was in the appellants' best interests to remain in the United Kingdom. Permission for grounds 4 and 5 was refused as they merely sought to reargue the appellants' case and disclosed no arguable error of law.

              The appellant's renewed their application for permission on grounds 4 and 5 and the application came before me on 5 June 2024. I refused permission stating:

"There is no merit in either challenge. The appellants representatives and aunt in the United Kingdom had ample time to obtain relevant evidence, see [17(b)] of the determination. The appellants had been put on notice as to the inadequacy of the medical evidence as far back as the 2021 First-tier decision of Judge Thapar.

"As to the second issue (ground 5 in the appellants application), where it is said that the judge does not deal with the appellants emotional needs, [19] of the determination indicates that no such claim was advanced to the judge at the hearing, and see [28] of Judge Thapa's determination.