Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
( Civil service - EIB staff - Individual award - OLAF investigation - Recovery of sums unduly paid - Article 16.3 of the EIB Staff Rules - Principle of good administration - Principle of transparency - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials )
European Investment Bank (EIB), represented by T. Gilliams, C. Pierre and I. Zanin, acting as Agents, and by K. Veranneman, lawyer,
composed of J. Svenningsen, President, J. Laitenberger (Rapporteur) and J. Martín y Pérez de Nanclares, Judges,
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, ET, seeks, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 11 January 2024 to recover an amount of EUR 37 817.23 paid in respect of individual awards for the years 2019 to 2021 ('the contested decision') and, secondly, compensation for the damage he claims to have suffered as a result of the recovery of that amount.
On 1 July 2019, the applicant was recruited under a fixed-term employment contract for four years at level 7 as Head of the [ confidential ] ( 1 ) Division within the Secretariat General of the EIB in Luxembourg (Luxembourg), subject to a six-month probationary period that ended on 31 December 2019.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.