Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
The case originated in an application against Slovakia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on 11 October 2021.
The applicant, a Slovak national, was represented by Mr O. Urban, a lawyer practising in Bratislava.
The applicant's details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table.
The applicant complained of the excessive length of the civil proceedings, held before two levels of jurisdiction, concerning her action for defamation against a renowned web publisher. The applicant also complained that the Constitutional Court had segmented the period under examination and had failed to consider the overall length of the proceedings in accordance with the Court's case-law. The impugned period started on 18 July 2014 when the action was lodged, and the proceedings are currently pending before the appellate court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.