Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             Today I am able to conclude proceedings in respect of W who was born on 20 March 2018.� The proceedings started in the Autumn of last year.
             For today's purposes the applicant, West Sussex County Council, has been represented by Mr Butler.� Mr Butler has been present for most of the hearings in these proceedings and I am extremely grateful for the way in which he has navigated what has been a complex situation which has presented various different challenges from time to time.
             The first respondent is the mother, M B L, represented by Ms Ciborowska.� Again, Ms Ciborowska has appeared on a number of occasions.� In addition, she has been instructed by Lisa Ursell, who has gone beyond the norm in terms of providing what I consider to be an excellent service to the mother, who has remained in Mauritius throughout these proceedings.�
             It is testament to the professionalism of those representing the mother that we have been able to deal with proceedings in a completely fair and open way, notwithstanding that great distance.� In addition, of course, the interpreters have played their part in that as well.
             W's father has not played any part in the proceedings.� W's interests have been represented through his children's Guardian, Ms Ingledew and again, on a regular basis, Ms Gottschling has appeared on behalf of W.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.