Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Transcription Agency, 24-28 High Street, Hythe, Kent, CT21 5AT Tel: 01303 230038 Email: [email protected]
Legal Representation Miss N Miller (Counsel) on behalf of the Applicant Mother The Father (Respondent Father), Litigant in Person Miss Vickers (Counsel) on behalf of the Respondent Child via the Guardian Other Parties Present and their status None known Judgment date: 3 May 2023 Transcribed from 12:01:57 until 12:58:43 ____________________
As set out in section 1(1) of the Children Act. As I have said from the outset Eve has therefore been at the forefront of my mind and her welfare has been my paramount consideration.
To inform her own assessment and in her analysis there are clear themes and patterns of alienating behaviour displayed by the father which is evident, she says, in his statement, in his behaviours and in his thoughts.
And that her biggest fear is that if Eve is not moved now she will lose her mother but also the freedom to make choices due to the father's strict expectations.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.