Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellants are granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellants , likely to lead members of the public to identify them . Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.
             The appellants seek to appeal a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge F Allen ("the Judge") dismissing their human rights appeals on 28 December 2023.
             The Judge issued an anonymity order under rule 13 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014. I have not been asked to rescind that order and I consider that it is appropriate to maintain it for the reasons observed by the Judge at [10] of her decision.
             At the hearing the appellants were represented by Mr Halim as they are before me. The respondent was not represented. The Judge heard evidence from the first two appellants. The Judge applied the relevant guidance in view of the first appellant's vulnerabilities. The first appellant has a diagnosis of a single episode depressive disorder, severe, without psychotic symptoms and generalised anxiety disorder.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.