Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
��������� Robert Spano, President, ��������� Jon Fridrik Kj�lbro, ��������� Angelika Nu�berger, ��������� Paul Lemmens, ��������� Yonko Grozev, ��������� Vincent A. De Gaetano, ��������� Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, ��������� Faris Vehabović, ��������� Iulia Antoanella Motoc, ��������� Carlo Ranzoni, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ��������� Marko Bo�njak, ��������� Tim Eicke, ��������� Darian Pavli, ��������� Erik Wennerstr�m, ��������� Saadet Y�ksel, judges, and S�ren Prebensen, Deputy Grand Chamber Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 11 July, 4 and 6 September 2019 and on 17 February 2021,
The case originated in an application (no. 35252/08 ) against the Kingdom of Sweden lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Swedish foundation, Centrum f�r r�ttvisa (�the applicant�), on 14 July 2008.
The applicant was represented by Mr F. Bergman and Ms A. Evans, lawyers practising in Stockholm. The Swedish Government (�the Government�) were represented by their Agent, Ms E. Hammarskj�ld, Director General for Legal Affairs, Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
The applicant alleged that the Swedish legislation and practice in the field of signals intelligence violated its rights under Article 8 of the Convention and that it did not have an effective remedy in this regard, contrary to Article 13 of the Convention.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.