Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.���� This is a claimant's application for leave to appeal from the decision of an appeal tribunal with reference BE/3925/20/51/P.
2.���� An oral hearing of the application has been requested. �However, I consider that the proceedings can properly be determined without an oral hearing.
3.���� For the reasons I give below, I grant leave to appeal. �I allow the appeal under Article 15(8)(b) of the Social Security (NI) Order 1998. �I refer the appeal to a newly constituted tribunal for determination.
6.���� The appellant submits that the tribunal has erred in law on the basis that:
7.���� The Department was invited to make observations on the appellant's grounds. �Ms Toner of Decision Making Services (DMS) responded on behalf of the Department. �She did not support the application on any of the grounds submitted. �However, in the appellant's interests, she submitted that the tribunal had potentially erred in law on the basis that the issue of capability for work-related activity was not considered fully. �She indicated that the Department supported the application on that ground.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.