Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
AND IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 51 & 53 OF THE TRUSTS (JERSEY) LAW 1984 (AS AMENDED)
By representation dated 17 th March 2020 the Representor, ("the Trustee"), Trustee of the Arpettaz Settlement ("the Trust") seeks the directions of the Court in respect of how it should conduct itself in the context of litigation extant before the English High Court.
We heard submissions in this matter on 8 th April 2020. We then directed the parties to file additional arguments and authorities which were received from the First Respondent's advocate on 24 th April 2020 and the Representor's advocate on 29 th April 2020.
Subsequently the members of the Court met to consider the additional documentation filed and our decision in this matter. We gave our decision on 29 th June 2020 and now give our reasons for that decision.
This sum was duly paid into the Trust on 12 th February 2012 by the settlor's wife. This is the only significant settlement that was made into the Trust and it is this payment which is the subject of litigation before the English High Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.