A Mother v A Father & Anor

Mr Zimran Samuel (Counsel) on behalf of the Second Respondent Child (via the Guardian)

           This is a judgement following an application dated 4 July 2022 bought by A against B for a Female Genital Mutilation Protection Order in respect of C. C is the second respondent to the proceedings through her Cafcass guardian. The Court also has to consider whether to continue the Family Law injunction taken out in March 2022 and to consider B's application for contact issued shortly before this hearing.

           A has been represented by Ms Omideyi of counsel, B represents himself and C has been represented by Mr Samuel of counsel. Both parents speak reasonable English but have had the benefit of an interpreter during the hearing.

           I have considered the documents in the trial bundle and heard oral evidence from A and B as well as their oral submissions. Special measures have been in place by way of separate waiting rooms and screens. B was directed to file written questions to be put to A by way of cross examination. He did not do so but his case, as set out in his written statement and responses to the schedule of findings, was ably put to A by counsel for C. B was then given an opportunity to ask anything further but declined that invitation.

           C was born abroad. It was apparent to both parents early on that she was not developing normally. She has been diagnosed with neurobiological conditions. She has an education and healthcare plan. She currently lives with A and has had no contact with B for some time.