Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
HEALTH SERVICE EXECUTIVE AND SONIC HEALTHCARE (IRELAND) LIMITED AND MEDLAB PATHOLOGY LIMITED AND
This appeal is concerned with the proper implementation of the disclosure regime introduced in personal injuries litigation by S.I. 391 of 1998.�
The personal injury summons herein was issued on the 22 nd November, 2018. By the time of the commencement of the proceedings, there was one expert report available to the plaintiff�s solicitors from Professor John Shepherd, a consultant surgeon and gynaecological oncologist, dated the 5 th August, 2018.�
The plaintiff�s solicitors herein are also the legal representatives of a significant number of women bringing similar claims relating to the operation of the CervicalCheck scheme.�
The second, third and fourth defendants in these proceedings are all related entities to which the first defendant contracted the examination of cervical smear samples.� In the course of this appeal, counsel for the plaintiff informed the court that there is, in reality, one participating defendant in this case, namely the fourth defendant, Clinical Pathology Laboratories Incorporated (�CPL�).� Counsel for CPL did not disagree with this characterisation.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.