Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 10 • Freedom of expression • Unjustified conviction and fine for placing Santa Claus accessories on communist leader�s statue as a symbolic gesture, in the context of nation-wide political protests • Nuanced consideration required of necessity of penalising acts which do not destroy or physically impair monuments, taking into account the nature and intention of the act, the message conveyed, and the social significance of the monument
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Tim Eicke, President , ��������� Yonko Grozev, ��������� Faris Vehabović, ��������� Iulia Antoanella Motoc, ��������� Armen Harutyunyan, ��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, ��������� Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges , and Andrea Tamietti, Section Registrar ,
the application (no. 10783/14 ) against the Republic of Bulgaria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Bulgarian national, Mr Kaloyan Tomov Handzhiyski (�the applicant�), on 28 January 2014;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.