Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 6 � 1 (criminal) and Art 6 � 3 • Fair trial of applicant, with slight intellectual disability, resulting in conviction for murder and prison sentence • Lack of sufficient indications requiring authorities to consider applicant a particularly vulnerable person and make appropriate adjustments • Applicant�s defence rights not irretrievably prejudiced or right to a fair trial not adversely affected • Authorities took all necessary steps
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Ksenija Turković, President, ��������� Alena Pol�čkov�, ��������� P�ter Paczolay, ��������� Gilberto Felici, ��������� Erik Wennerstr�m, ��������� Raffaele Sabato, ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges, and Renata Degener, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 39654/15 ) against the Slovak Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Slovak national, Ms Jana Has�likov� (�the applicant�), on 3 August 2015;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.