Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellants are granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellants, likely to lead members of the public to identify them. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              This matter concerns appeals against the Respondent's decision letter of 14 February 2022, refusing the Appellants' family asylum and protection claim initially made on 19 October 2018.
              The Appellants' claims are made on the basis that they have been financially extorted and otherwise targeted, including the First Appellant being kidnapped, by the Tehreek-e-Taliban in Pakistan. They fear that on return the Tehreek-e-Taliban will torture or kill them, or kidnap the children and use them as suicide bombers.
              In its decision letter of 14 February 2022, the Respondent accepted that the Tehreek-e-Taliban kidnapped the Appellant and extorted money because he had provided a consistent and sufficiently detailed account of this aspect of the claim, which was also consistent with relevant country information. Nevertheless, the claim was refused as the Respondent considered that sufficiency of protection and internal relocation were available to the family.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.