Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CONNÉTABLE AND PROCUREURS DU BIEN PUBLIC OF THE PARISH OF ST JOHN
The representation invited a date to be fixed for the hearing of the matter before the Inferior Number. The Court determined of its motion that, in accordance with custom, the matter should be heard before the Superior Number which we convened for this purpose.
We should say at the outset that despite the implied criticism of the Attorney General by the Connétable for bringing this representation, we consider that he has done so in accordance with custom: and in the circumstances it was his duty to bring the matter to the attention of the Court for adjudication and he should not be criticised for it. We will return to the nature of the Court's jurisdiction later in this judgment, but we consider that the hearing and hopefully this judgment will be useful for the honorary service in all the parishes.
"26. The Representor submits in light of the above that the following matters fall to be considered:
(a) The First Respondent's conduct which gave rise to the conviction for dangerous driving together with the Magistrate's conclusions as to his evidence:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.