Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 3 (procedural) • Ineffective investigation into applicant�s ill-treatment by police officers • Exemption of police officers from criminal liability due to statutory time-limit expiration resulting from protracted investigation and imposition of suspended sentences • Manifest disproportionality between the gravity of the police officers� acts and punishment imposed • Lack of serious efforts to identify and punish third perpetrator
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Paul Lemmens, President, ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Dmitry Dedov, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Anja Seibert-Fohr, ��������� Peeter Roosma, ��������� Andreas Z�nd, judges, and Milan Bla�ko, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 9183/09 ) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Russian national, Mr Vadim Kurbanovich Barovov (�the applicant�), on 10 December 2008;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.