Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 2 (procedural) • Effective investigation • Effective criminal proceedings into the death of the applicant's wife, allegedly as a result of medical negligence • Despite initial shortcomings during inquiry stage of investigation, domestic authorities eventually responded adequately to applicant's allegation and clarified events surrounding his wife's death
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, President , ��������� Tim Eicke, ��������� Branko Lubarda, ��������� Armen Harutyunyan, ��������� Ana Maria Guerra Martins, ��������� Anne Louise Bormann, ��������� Sebastian Răduleţu, judges , and Simeon Petrovski, Deputy Section Registrar ,
the application (no. 53081/14 ) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by an Armenian national, Mr Harutyun Karapetyan ("the applicant"), on 15 July 2014;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.