Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
A yard formed part of a lease of arches to a paint spraying company. Applicant applied to close the title to the yard on the grounds that his predecessors had acquired title to it by adverse possession. HELD that the yard had been acquired by adverse possession, but that on Applicant-�s predecessor-�s bankruptcy the yard had vested in the trustee in bankruptcy. By virtue of section 11(4)(c) Land Registration Act 2002, on first registration Respondent took free of the trustee-�s interest since it had no notice of the interest
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2018] UKFTT 321 (PC)
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.