Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, [the appellants] ( and/or any member of his family, expert, witness or other person the Tribunal considers should not be identified ) is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellants, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellants ( and/or other person ). Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
              This is an appeal against the determination of First-tier Tribunal Judge Chohan promulgated on 21 st September 2023, following a hearing at Birmingham CJC on 11 th September 2023. In the determination, the judge dismissed the appeal of the Appellants. The Appellants subsequently applied for, and were granted, permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, and thus the matter comes before me.
              The Appellants are sibling brothers. Both are citizens of Afghanistan. The first Appellant was born on 21 st March 2004 and the second Appellant was born on 21 st March 2006. Both have applied to join their elder sponsoring brother in the UK, Mr Mahram Alizada. Both have been refused.
              The judge gave the background to the Appellants' claim by pointing out that, "after the sponsoring brother and the uncle had in 2016 left Afghanistan and come to the UK, the appellants were left in the care of 'Jawed'." The judge explained that:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.