Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 34 • Victim • Express acknowledgment by the Constitutional Court of Art 5 � 3 breach for second part of applicants� pre-trial detention not in itself sufficient redress in absence of compensation award • No clear and established avenue in domestic law for claiming adequate compensation
Art 5 � 3 • Reasonableness and length of pre-trial detention • Failure of competent courts, as per Constitutional Court�s findings, to give relevant and sufficient reasons justifying second part of pre-trial detention for over two years resulting in overall breach
Art 5 � 4 • Speediness of review • Constitutional Court�s review of lawfulness of detention lasting more than two years
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.