Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 35 � 3 (b) • Significant disadvantage in light of sweeping measures, despite lack of detailed financial account submitted by applicant, and raising important questions as to application of domestic legislation
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� S�ofra O�Leary, President, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� Ganna Yudkivska, ��������� Lətif H�seynov, ��������� Jovan Ilievski, ��������� Lado Chanturia, ��������� Arnfinn B�rdsen, judges, and Martina Keller, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 2591/19 ) against Georgia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Georgian national, Ms Ani Gachechiladze (�the applicant�), on 13 December 2018;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.