Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             With regard to the High Court costs an order for costs had been made against the appellants by the trial judge.� This court in its judgment (para. 157) upheld the said order, finding that the trial judge was entitled to make the said orders as she did in circumstances where a number of concessions had been made by the respondent in relation to the costs of the action.�
(a)                the special and unusual circumstances of the case;
(b)                the public interest;
(c)                the �test case� nature of the litigation; and
(d)                certain special factors said to engage the discretion of this court pursuant to s. 169(1) of the Legal Services Regulation Act, 2015 including in particular:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.