Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.���� This is a claimant's application for leave to appeal from the decision of an appeal tribunal with reference BE/13053/22/02/D.
2.���� For the reasons I give below, I set aside the decision of the appeal tribunal under Article 15(7) of the Social Security (NI) Order 1998.
6.���� The appellant, represented by Ms Stride, submits that the tribunal has erred in law by:
7.���� The Department was invited to make observations on the appellant's grounds. �Mr Killeen of Decision Making Services (DMS) responded on behalf of the Department. �Mr Killeen submitted that the tribunal had erred in law on one of the submitted grounds. �He indicated that the Department supported the application.
10.�� PIP was established by article 82 of the Welfare Reform (NI) Order 2015. �It consists of a daily living component and a mobility component. �These components may be payable to claimants whose ability to carry out daily activities or mobility activities is limited, or severely limited, by their physical or mental condition. �The Personal Independence Payment Regulations (NI) 2016 (the 2016 Regulations) set out the detailed requirements for satisfying the above conditions.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.