Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Natalie Gamble (instructed by NGA Law) for the 1st & 2nd Applicants Ms Ruth Cabeza (instructed by Eskinazi & Co Limited) for the 3rd Respondent Mrs & Mrs Z did not attend the hearing Ms Melanie Carew (Cafcass Legal) as Advocate to the Court Hearing dates: 10th March 2020 and 20th May 2020 ____________________
(1) On an application made by two people ("the applicants"), the court may make an order providing for a child to be treated in law as the child of the applicants if�
(c) two persons who are living as partners in an enduring family relationship and are not within prohibited degrees of relationship in relation to each other.
(3) Except in a case falling within subsection (11), the applicants must apply for the order during the period of 6 months beginning with the day on which the child is born.
(5) At the time of the making of the order both the applicants must have attained the age of 18.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.