Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(ii) I was swayed against discharge on the basis an accountancy report would be available by Christmas 2018 and that would lead to decisions being taken.
(iii) I placed a reporting requirement on the prosecuting authorities that they report by 24 January 2019 and specifically stated I required a firm decision on the case by the end of January 2019.
(i) This applicant was arrested in August 2015 � 3� years later no charges have been laid despite the fact that police seized all relevant documentation and core documentation at that time.
(ii) I was clear in October 2018 that I was not discharging the Restraint Order then due to assurances that there would be a forensic report by December�2018 and decisions by January 2019. The goal posts moved to February 2019 for the report and now the end of March. Maybe on the face of it that is not a significant further time but there is no clear path when the PPS will take a decision after that. Given the pace to date in this case I am not optimistic this will be swift.
(iii) It should have been clear I was not going to tolerate further delay given my ruling in October.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.