Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
MR. JUSTICE T.C. SMYTH DELIVERED HIS JUDGMENT, AS FOLLOWS, ON TUESDAY, 15TH JUNE 2004
MR. JUSTICE SMYTH : On 3rd November 2003, O'Sullivan J granted the Applicant leave to apply for judicial review to claim the following reliefs:
The grounds permitted to be advanced were eleven in number and were set out in the statement grounding the application.
The Applicant was and is a law graduate of Dublin University. She achieved a Degree, rated as 2.1, with an average standard of 67%, which is an Honours Degree (in the year 2003). The course she followed at the university was a four-year course, in the third year of which (2001-2002) she studied Company Law and achieved a grade of 69%. Almost to the day, a year later, in response to her application to the Respondent to sit the entrance examination of the Respondent, she was furnished with information which included:
The Applicant avers that she studied diligently for the entrance examination during the summer of 2003. On 1st September 2003, the Applicant presented herself at the venue for the entrance examination and signed a form whereby she stated that she had read, understood and would abide by the entrance examination rules, regulations and procedures of King's Inns, which had been sent to her some two months earlier on 2nd July 2003 having before the latter date paid her examination fee.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.