Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
1.��� The appellant has brought an appeal against the decision of the appeal tribunal sitting at Newry on 28 January 2011.
2.��� Leave to appeal was granted by the legally qualified member of the appeal tribunal on 1 May 2011.
3.��� No hearing of the appeal has been requested and I am satisfied that it can properly be determined without a hearing.
5.��� The appellant was awarded the high rate of the mobility component and the high rate of the care component of disability living allowance from 19 June 2008 to 18 June 2010. �She made a renewal claim and a decision was made on 18 August 2010 to award her the high rate of the mobility component but only the low rate of the care component (on the basis of the main meal test) from 19 June 2010 to 18 June 2012.
6.��� She appealed and the appeal was heard by a tribunal sitting at Newry on 28 January 2011. �The tribunal made a decision to the same effect as the Department, maintaining the award of high rate mobility component but replacing the award of the low rate of the care component on the basis of the �main meal� test with the same rate of the care component on the basis of the �significant portion of the day� test.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.