Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
W. J. Bailhache, Q.C., Deputy Bailiff, and Jurats Clapham, Le Cornu, Morgan, Marett-Crosby, Milner and Olsen.
On 21 st March the Assembly received an ex-parte application by the Yacht Hotel Limited which holds, inter alia, a 7 th category licence for the Drift nightclub within premises known as the Royal Yacht Hotel, St Helier. The application was for the extension of the 7 th category licence and the designation of the extended area as a designated nightclub; and for a variation to existing conditions with respect to the licence. The applicant requested that the Assembly:-
(i) Extend the area subject to the licence to include the area defined in the plan as presented to the Assembly and conditional upon such extension, designate the extended area as a designated nightclub;
(ii) If the licence was extended as requested, designated the outside areas of the premises as shown on the plan presented to the Assembly as the designated smoking areas;
(iii) Remove the restriction attached to the licence in respect of part of the premises which is in these terms "that the extended area as shown on the plan presented to the Assembly may be used neither for the sale or consumption of alcohol", and to replace that condition with an amended condition which provided "that the outside areas as shown on the plan presented to the Assembly may not be used for the sale of alcohol".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.