Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 10 • Freedom to receive information • Procedural dysfunction or fault on part of domestic authorities and courts when reviewing and denying request to access restricted Presidential decrees, labelled as �not for publication� and �not for printing� • No provision for the labels in national legislation • Failure of domestic courts to provide relevant and sufficient reasons
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� S�ofra O�Leary, President, ��������� Mārtiņ� Mits, ��������� Ganna Yudkivska, ��������� Latif H�seynov, ��������� Jovan Ilievski, ��������� Lado Chanturia, ��������� Arnfinn B�rdsen and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 23897/10 ) against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Ukrainian national, Mr Yuriy Vladimirovich Chumak (�the applicant�), on 12 April 2010;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.