Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, BSK and KSK are granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of BSK and KSK, likely to lead members of the public to identify them. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
      For ease of reference and consistency with the First-tier Tribunal decision, we shall hereafter refer to BSK and KSK as the Appellants, and the Secretary of State as the Respondent.
      The Appellants were born on 9 December 1965 and 20 November 1996 respectively. They claim to be Afghani citizens. The Respondent asserts they are Indian citizens. The Appellants appealed against the decision of the Respondent dated 28 November 2022, refusing their protection claims.
      The Respondent appealed against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge (FtTJ) Nazir, promulgated on 22 May 2023, allowing the appeals.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.