Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The court shall immediately notify the claimant and the organiser(s) of the gatherings, meetings, rallies, demonstrations or other peaceful assemblies about the opening of the proceedings, and the date, time and place of examination of the case.
The administrative case concerning the restriction of the right to peaceful assembly shall be decided by the court within three days after the opening of the proceedings, or immediately where the proceedings are opened less than three days prior to the holding of the events in question.
The court shall allow the claimant's claims in the interests of national security and public order, where it establishes that the holding of gatherings, meetings, rallies, demonstrations or other assemblies may create a real risk of disturbances or crime, or endanger the health of the population or the rights and freedoms of other people. In its ruling, the court shall indicate the manner in which the exercise of the right to peaceful assembly is to be restricted.
The ruling of the court in cases concerning the restriction of the exercise of the right to peaceful assembly shall be enforced immediately.
Copies of the court's ruling shall be handed out immediately to the parties to the proceedings, or sent to them if they were not present during the delivery of the decision. "
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.