Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Advocate N. M. Sanders for the English Claimants (Second to the Fifth Respondents).
On 11 th August, 2020, the Court heard and determined an application made on behalf of the trustee ("the Trustee") of the Arpettaz Settlement ("the Trust").
The background to this application is contained in the judgment of the Royal Court in relation to this Trust reported at In the matter of the Arpettaz Settlement [2020] JRC 161 .
As can be seen from that judgment, on 29 th June, 2020, the Court made various orders including approving the in principle decision of the Trustee to submit to the jurisdiction of the English High Court in relation to claims issued by the English Claimants, to consent to being added as a party to the said proceedings and to adopt a neutral stance in relation to allegations made in the English Claimants' draft re-amended particulars of claim.
In those proceedings the Principal Beneficiary is also a defendant and has adopted an active stance defending the claims made by the English Claimants in respect of the assets which form the corpus of the trust fund.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.