Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Faris Vehabović , President , Branko Lubarda, Sebastian Răduleţu , judges , and Crina Kaufman, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
The application concerns the applicant's extended medical detention in a psychiatric hospital (since 2011) and the consequences this measure had for the conduct of civil proceedings concerning the property title to his family house.
In a judgment delivered on 31 January 2023, the Court held that there had been a violation of Articles 5 § 1 (e) of the Convention on account of his extended medical detention and of Article 6 § 1 on account of inadequate service of court notifications and assistance for the applicant to argue his civil claims. The Court also awarded the applicant 16,300 euros (EUR) for non - pecuniary damage and dismissed the remainder of the claims for just satisfaction.
On 11 April 2023 Government informed the Court that they had learned from the applicant's representative that the applicant had died on 21 March 2022 in an elderly care facility. They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.