General

Inland Revenue v. Scottish Provident Institution

[2004] UKHL 52House of Lords2004

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION 2004-05 4th REPORT ( [2004] UKHL 52 ) APPELLATE COMMITTEE

��The Committee (Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Steyn, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe) have met and considered the cause Her Majesty's Commissioners of Inland Revenue (Appellants) v. Scottish Provident Institution (Respondents) (Scotland) . We have heard counsel on behalf of the appellants and respondents.

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More General cases

Pepper Finance Corporation [Ireland] Designated Activity Company v O'Reilly [Otherwise O'Reilly] (Approved)

[2026] IEHC 2026IEHC16

Charles Kelly Ltd v Companies Act 2014 (Approved)

[2026] IEHC 2026IEHC140

O'Donnell v Superintendent For The Cahir District and Anor (Approved)

[2026] IEHC 2026IEHC226

Hoctor and Ors v An Coimisiun Pleanala and Anor (Approved) (Rev1)

[2026] IEHC 2026IEHC65

Rogers v The Director of Public Prosecutions & Ors (Approved)

[2026] IEHC 2026IECA5

Pender v Punter Southall Group Limited (Court of Appeal : Appeal (Civil) : Crow, Perry, Wolffe : Costs)

[2026] UR 2026_073

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

General

Inland Revenue v. Scottish Provident Institution

[2004] UKHL 52House of Lords2004

Cite this case in OSCOLA →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.