Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 3 P1 • Vote • Justified disenfranchisement of person with intellectual disability, based on thorough, individualised assessment by domestic courts • Free expression of the opinion of the people • Margin of appreciation for States • Systems disenfranchising persons with mental disabilities must apply only to those effectively unable to make a free and self-determined electoral choice, as in present case
Art 14 (+ Art 3 P1) • Art 1 P12 • Discrimination • Justified difference in treatment based on mental capacity
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Paul Lemmens, President, ��������� Georgios A. Serghides, ��������� Dmitry Dedov, ��������� Georges Ravarani, ��������� Mar�a El�segui, ��������� Anja Seibert-Fohr, ��������� Peeter Roosma, judges, and Milan Bla�ko, Section Registrar,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.