Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Kathryn Blair for the Applicant Ms Julie Okine for the First Respondent Ms Ghazal Hill for the Second Respondent Mr Baldip Singh Aulak for the Third Respondent Mr Andrew Shaw for the Fourth Respondent Ms Danielle Lewis for the Fifth Respondent Ms Wing Yan Chan for the Sixth Respondent Hearing dates: 30 April � 4 May, 8 May 2018 ____________________
It was nice to meet you last week at Court. I was very impressed with how brave you were not only to come to Court but also to speak to a Judge about what you wanted.
I have now listened to all the information that everybody wanted to tell me about you and the younger children. Most importantly I have listened to what your mum wanted to say.
You should know that having listened to your mum and read other information about your dads I have no doubt they all love you very much. Sadly, your dads have things they need to deal with that make their lives harder and mean that whilst they want to see you they can't look after you. This does not mean they love you any less.
I hope you will feel able to read this letter and that you will keep it so that you can read it again if you want when things have started to settle down. I wish you both the best in the future with your school and life generally. It is very important that you remember how valuable your relationship as brother and sister is. I am sure [ZZ] and [YY] will continue to enjoy seeing you and it will mean so much more to each of them if you are happy when you meet up.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.